There is No Proof That Christ Immanuel Is Christ Jesus
Never Forget This Truth: "The FATHER" of "Christ Jesus" said so. Remember This Truth.
||<1>||
There is no independent, external historical proof that demonstrates Matthew 1:22–23’s claim as an empirically verified fact. The assertion rests on the authority and testimony of the Gospel of Matthew itself, interpreted within a particular theological framework. Here is a clear breakdown of what exists and what does not.
1. What Matthew actually claims (Only an opinion/thought)
Matthew states that the events surrounding Jesus’ conception and birth (Mary’s pregnancy by the Holy Spirit, Joseph’s dream, the naming of the child Jesus) fulfilled Isaiah 7:14. The writer presents this as a divinely intended correspondence: the earlier oracle finds its (or a) true realization in Jesus.
2. The evidence available?
-
The Gospel texts themselves Matthew and Luke are the only New Testament sources that report a virgin conception. Mark and John do not mention it. The claim therefore depends on the reliability of Matthew’s (and Luke’s) narrative and their sources.
-
The Isaiah quotation Isaiah 7:14 in the Hebrew uses the word almah (“young woman” of marriageable age). The Greek Septuagint translated it as parthenos (“virgin”). Matthew quotes the Greek version and applies it to Mary. Whether this is a precise predictive prophecy or a typological re-reading is debated.
-
Early Christian acceptance By the second century the virgin birth was widely affirmed in Christian writings (Ignatius, Justin Martyr, the Apostles’ Creed tradition, etc.). This shows the claim was early and widely held within the church, but it is still internal Christian testimony, not external corroboration.
-
Absence of contradictory contemporary records No first-century non-Christian source confirms or denies the virgin birth. Roman, Jewish, or other records from the period simply do not address the details of Jesus’ conception.
3. What is not available
-
No archaeological evidence.
-
No independent eyewitness affidavits outside the Gospel tradition.
-
No contemporary Jewish or pagan acknowledgment that Isaiah 7:14 was fulfilled in Jesus.
-
No scientific or medical verification (the claim is, by nature, miraculous and therefore outside ordinary historical method).
4. How different perspectives treat the claim
-
Traditional Christian view The proof is the combined testimony of Scripture (Matthew’s inspired interpretation of Isaiah), the apostolic preaching, and the coherence of the incarnation doctrine. Faith accepts the Gospel writers as reliable witnesses authorized by God.
-
Historical-critical view Matthew is engaged in theological interpretation (midrash or typology). He reads the earlier text in light of the conviction that Jesus is the Messiah and finds correspondence. The virgin-birth story is seen as a later theological development rather than a verifiable historical report that “proves” the prophecy.
-
Jewish interpretive tradition Isaiah 7:14 is understood as a sign given to Ahaz in the 8th century BC and fulfilled in that historical setting. It is not regarded as a prediction of a future virgin-born Messiah named Jesus.
Summary
Matthew 1:22–23 asserts fulfillment; it does not supply external proof of that fulfillment. The evidence consists of the Gospel’s own testimony, the early church’s acceptance of that testimony, and the theological decision to read Isaiah through the lens of Jesus’ life. Whether that is regarded as sufficient depends on one’s prior evaluation of the New Testament’s historical reliability and divine authority. There is no separate, publicly verifiable body of proof that stands outside that framework.
What Really Happened
One day Matthew, after reading the scroll that at the time was only the length of about twenty chapters long, only stated to two others that He “thought” it might” be possible that what He read was about Jesus. Those two others started telling everyone they could tell Immanuel/Emmanuel was about the birth of Jesus. But Matthew did not say that. When the Church heard of this, they confronted these two men and said that their claim was not written in Isaiah; where did you get this Knowledge? They responded, “Matthew told us this.” The Church reacted just this way, “Well now, since it came from Matthew it must be True.” And that is exactly why that rumor was not stopped dead in its tracks. Instead of locating Matthew for verification the Church just took the word of two humans. Then instead of admitting to this mistake Matthew 1:23 was then entered to prevent embarrassment.
But Matthew did not write that into the book, He never said that. Hundreds of contributors have contributed many things in the Four Gospels, some contributors Holy, others not so Holy.
Names Are Important; They Have Power and if Matthew 1:23 is legit why are there no entry's of Christ Immanuel where the name Jesus, Jesus Christ or "Christ Jesus" are written anywhere in the Bible; how is it Christ Jesus did not refer to He Himself as Christ Immanuel in the Book of Revelation? That Truth is right out in the open! If there was ever a time for Christ Jesus to announce Himself as Christ Immanuel the Book of Revelation was that very opportunity! But He did not because He is not Christ Immanuel. Another has to sit to the Holy left of "The FATHER" and "Christ Jesus" already has His designated Holy Thrown to the right.
Here Is The Most Important Entry
"The FATHER" said Immanuel is not Jesus.
||<2>||
Context: A most important Prophecy that “Christ Jesus” spoke that did fulfill was Matthew 28:20. That fulfilled on February 8, 2009 at exactly 9:01pm EST. At that exact moment the Holy Torch passed from Christ Jesus to Christ Immanuel. With regard to your other questions, it is not about what I know or think, and with Respect, it is what you think you Know. The following is part of an Introduction to one of five books asked to be written by “The FATHER”.
In the witnessed 60 days visitation with “The FATHER”, “Christ Jesus”, Moses and Angels innumerable, the visit due to issues of both lost Respect and Hope for Wisdom for mankind, is to introduce humanity to "A New Way of Thinking” mainly because the Church fell into the snare of “They read into the Scriptures those things that do not exist.” ~ GOD, “The FATHER” of “Christ Jesus”. Mission Respect is about stopping the errors the false teachings of the Church and of course, much more.
Pedagogy; a teaching where the student is literally at the Mercy of the instructor to be given Truth. Interpretive Synthesis allows one to perceive a connection or meaningful pattern between unrelated or random things (such as objects or ideas) a technique Known of as Apophenia to justify anything and so the Church did, does and will not stop doing this. This means both Christ Jesus and Christ Immanuel need to be accurately defined.
|When once He, (Christ Jesus) had espoused His public career, subsequent to the technical completion of his purely mortal experience of Sovereignty acquirement, he did not hesitate publicly to admit that he was the Son of GOD. He did not hesitate to declare, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” He made no protest in later years when he was called Lord of Glory, Ruler of a Universe, the Lord God of all creation, the Holy One of Israel, the Lord of all, our Lord and our God, having a name above every name and on all worlds, the Omnipotence of a universe, the Universe Mind of this creation, the One in whom are hid all treasures of Wisdom and Knowledge, the fullness of Him who fills all things, the eternal Word of the eternal GOD, the One who was before all things and in whom all things consist, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, the Upholder of a universe, the Judge of all the earth, the Giver of life eternal, the True Shepherd, the Deliverer of the worlds, and the Captain of our Salvation. He never objected to any of these titles as they were applied to him subsequent to the emergence from His Purely human life into the later years of his self-consciousness of the ministry of Divinity in humanity, and for humanity, and to humanity on this world and for all other worlds.
Christ Jesus objected to but one title as applied to Him: When He was once called Immanuel, He merely replied, “NOT I, THAT IS MY ELDER BROTHER.” Q: Why is it that that is not in your Bible? “Christ Immanuel” defined: The Father to the court of the Creator Son; hence his name, Immanuel the problem solver of this super universe. The time has come, since February 2009 for you to be told that without this “Problem Solver” you will perish. Even Christ Jesus seeks advice from time to time from His Elder Brother.
Not forgetting “The Word” there is no legitimate written statement anywhere in Our World. A person can more easily determine “Christ Immanuel” cannot be “Christ Jesus” with other Knowledge. “Christ Jesus was not allowed by “The FATHER” to cross the political, social or economic ways of humanity. This is why when confronted by Pontius Pilate “CJ” only said to PP, “My Kingdom is not of this World” and no more keeping to those Holy Commands. If you study the character profile of “Christ Immanuel” He does and has to cross those lines or you will perish; if the Church keeps rejecting “Christ Immanuel”, you will perish. If the Church continues to keep tossing The Will of “The FATHER” into the lap of The Word, three issues of chaos, chaos, chaos will occur/are occurring right now: 1) a disrespect that shoots straight to the top: GOD, “The FATHER”; 2) unless this stops Christ Jesus can now be deemed a hypocrite because that is not what He said and taught and if that continues 3) morphs into an Identity crisis of sorts aka by psychologists as Dissociative Identity Disorder. This is why non-believers with an IQ can effortlessly make a similar determination on the hypocrisy issue alone. Any deviation from this requires Interpretive Synthesis/Apophenia.
Final clarifications: “Christ Jesus” is “The Word” who sits to the Holy Right Hand of “The FATHER”. “Christ Immanuel” is “The Will” who will sit to the Holy Left Hand of “The FATHER”. In the end this false claim created a domino effect of one metaphor after another that crept all of the way into the Book of Revelation and that created an environment that has led to the physical destruction of the Church and the Genocide of the Christian family and worse yet, the Church will not acknowledge those facts; that degenerating loss of Intelligence.